Epstein Secrets

e. Additionally, he stated the bed would almost always have to be made after the massage. On January 4 2006 I interviewed another former houseman, Mr Alfredo Rodriguez. During a sworn taped statement, Mr. Rodriguez stated he was employed by Jeffrey Epstein for fr°” November 2004 through May of 2005. His responsibili

have to be made after the massage. On January 4 2006 I interviewed another former houseman, Mr Alfredo Rodriguez. During a sworn taped statement, Mr. Rodriguez stated he was employed by Jeffrey Epstein for fr°” November 2004 through May of 2005. His responsibilities as house manager included being the butler

roses to, so that she could drive her self to Epstein's house without incident. Rodriguez said the girl always needed rides to and from the house. Rodiiguez produced a green folder which contained documents, and a note with Mr. Epstein's stationary with direction to deliver a bucket of roses to •·•••••··

rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18. U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United State

t "may reasonably assure the appear- ance of [the defendant] at trial will not [necessarily] assure the safety of the com- munity." United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir. 1991). [8] The Bail Reform Act sets forth the following four• factors to be considered in the release/remand analysis:

d States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering ... [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. [6,7] To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no condi

t "may reasonably assure the appear- ance of [the defendant] at trial will not [necessarily] assure the safety of the com- munity." United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir. 1991). [8] The Bail Reform Act sets forth the following four• factors to be considered in the release/remand analysis:

d States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering ... [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. [6,7] To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no condi