Epstein Secrets

PEARANCES: 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY g. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Hig

:71-0 ): .17 117 i::451 9 c.) PRESIDING: HONORABLE DEBORAH DALE PUCILCOP:Sn: ..rr4 , :• : .„-- ••••• APPEARANCES: 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY g. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: LANNA BELOHLAVEK, ESQUIRE 16 Assistant State Attorn

iami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, 33. ON APPELLANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRO- HIB

Defendant. ) ) ) 53 ..."°14 • lE i tr. PLEA CONFERENCE • HONORABLE DEBORAH DALE FOCI L r IN) 4-14 N, r^r-) 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: LANNA BELOHLAVEK, ESQUIRE 16 Assistant State Attorn

N, r^r-) 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Hig

iami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Pcrwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, JJ. ON APPELLANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRO- HIB

Defendant. ) ) ) ) •••74, ro sn • • 1•1 ;12 (1 7, F:F%74 2C • HONORABLE DEBORAH DALE PUCILtark., 1.-;; 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: LANNA BELOHLAIIEK, ESQUIRE 16 Assistant State Attor

k., 1.-;; 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Hig

iami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & BoIdt, and Kimberly L. Bolds, Miami, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, ON APPELLANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRO- HIBIT F