Epstein Secrets

PEARANCES: 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY g. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Hig

:71-0 ): .17 117 i::451 9 c.) PRESIDING: HONORABLE DEBORAH DALE PUCILCOP:Sn: ..rr4 , :• : .„-- ••••• APPEARANCES: 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY g. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: LANNA BELOHLAVEK, ESQUIRE 16 Assistant State Attorn

ppellate proceeding. West's P.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. [4] Child Custody 76D C ,903 76D Child Custody 76DXUI Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211k19.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

Defendant. ) ) ) 53 ..."°14 • lE i tr. PLEA CONFERENCE • HONORABLE DEBORAH DALE FOCI L r IN) 4-14 N, r^r-) 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: LANNA BELOHLAVEK, ESQUIRE 16 Assistant State Attorn

N, r^r-) 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Hig

llate proceeding. West's P.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.3100). [4.I Child Custody 76D fe=i903 76D Child Custody 76DX111 Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211k19.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

Defendant. ) ) ) ) •••74, ro sn • • 1•1 ;12 (1 7, F:F%74 2C • HONORABLE DEBORAH DALE PUCILtark., 1.-;; 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: LANNA BELOHLAIIEK, ESQUIRE 16 Assistant State Attor

k., 1.-;; 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 North Dixie Hig

llate proceeding. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. (4] Child Custody 76D sE :, 903 76D Child Custody 76DXHI Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211kI9.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody