Epstein Secrets

rm sexual fayprs. Epstein Was different from most sexual abuse suspects; he was far more powerful. He counted among his friends former President Bill.Clinton, Donald Truinp and Prince Andrew, along with some of the most prominent legal, scientific and business minds in the country. When detectives started

ys say. Unusual is the Word that best describes everything about the case against Epstein, 54, an enigmatic money manager in New York City who counts Bill Clinton and Donald: Trump among his friends. , CA/Aronbera-000173 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3 27 2023 2:57:43 PM NOT A CERTIFIED C

t. He reportedly hobnobs with the likes of former President Clinton, former Harvard University President Lawrence Sum

of his co-conspirators, and the identities of the victims have already been exposed, the need for grand jury secrecy is no more. See United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 234 (1940) (“[A]fter the grand jury’s functions are ended, disclosure is wholly proper where the ends ofjustice require it.”). WHEREFO

form ,sexual fayors. Epstein was diff~rentfrom m:ostsexual abuse suspects; he was.far more powerfoL He cotuited among his friends former President Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Prince,.Andrew, along with some of the most·proipinen~ leg:µ, ~cientific aJld busµi,ess minds in i,he q:rnnJry. When d~tec.tives

ntensely private.” The media.frenzy did not begin iri full until a decade later. In September 2002, Epstein was flung into the limelight when he flew Clinton and actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker to Africa on his private jet. I Suddenly everyone wanted to know who Epstein was. New York magazine and Vani

of his co-conspirators, and the identities of the victims have already been exposed, the need for grand jury secrecy is no more. See United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 234 (1940) (“[A]fter the grand jury’s functions are ended, disclosure is wholly proper where the ends ofjustice require it.”). WHEREFO

osition testimony in connection with third Watergate grand jury); In re Unseal Dockets Related to the Indep. Counsel’s 1998 Investigation ofPresident Clinton, 308 F. Supp. 3d 314 (D.D.C. 2018) (release of records related to independent counsel’s investigation of President Clinton); In Re: Application of th

related to independent counsel’s investigation of President Clinton); In Re: Application of the Committee on the Judi

f time that has passed, and the widely reported nature ofthis miscarriage ofjustice, there is no additional need for maintaining secrecy. See U.S. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150,.234 (1940) (“[A]fter the grand juty’s functions are ended, disclosure is wholly proper where the ends ofjustice require it.”). 112. Co