Epstein Secrets

g wrong Sent from my iPhone On Dec 15, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Michael Wolff < > wrote: Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal govern

arded message --- From: Ken Starr < Date: Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM Subject: Re: To: J < [email protected]> Cc: Alan Dershowitz < Here goes: "Sweetheart deal! " So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend - Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is pr

PM, Michael Wolff ≤ > wrote: oms vet the he reason apportunity hero yo voke ons dion engertion He had been publicly government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, ha

rded message ---- From: Ken Starr < Date: Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM Subject: Re: To: J< <[email protected]> Cc: Alan Dershowitz < Here goes: "Sweetheart deal! " So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is p

3:19 PM Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Kathy Ruemmler Re: ; Darren Indyke Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal govern

d message --------- From: Ken Starr - Date: Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM Subject: Re: To: J < [email protected]> Cc: Alan Dershowitz Here goes: "Sweetheart deal! " So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is p