Epstein Secrets

OW C.M.A., I I I I Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. $eated FILED UNDER SEAL' DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND SARAH KELLEN'S MOTION FOR STAY • This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office (by Assist

I I Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. $eated FILED UNDER SEAL' DEFENDA

and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 11. Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that

olved the exact same crimes and same evidence being reviewed by the U.S. Attorney's office when he was employed there. Specifically, he represented Sarah Kellen (Epstcin's number one co-conspirator who was actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper (Louella Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry

ployed there. Specifically, he represented Sarah Kellen (Epstcin's number one co-conspirator who was actu

ttorney's Office. She provided additional details of Epstein's sexual abuse of her." (DE48 at 17.) And, one of Petitioners' counsel's other clients, S.R., was originally interviewed in October 2007 and refined to provide information regarding Epstein. (DE 14 at ¶ 7.) During the time that Epstein was

the exact same crimes and exact same evidence being reviewed by the U.S. Attorney's office when he was employed there. Specifically, he represented Sarah Kellen (Epstein's number one co-conspirator whoyvas actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper (Louella Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry

ployed there. Specifically, he represented Sarah Kellen (Epstein's number one co-conspirator whoyvas actu

ent that might have shed light on improper influences. Along with other capable attorneys, I was involved in representing one of Epstein's victims (S.R.) who filed a federal civil case against Epstein. Suspecting that Epstein may have improperly influenced your office, we immediately served discovery

not use non-public Government information for any purpose. 14. After opening my private practice on January 2, 2008, I was retained to represent Sarah Kellen for purposes of civil depositions in causes of action to which the United States was not a party. At a later time, I was retained to represent seve

nuary 2, 2008, I was retained to represent Sarah Kellen for purposes of civil depositions in causes of ac

ttorney's Office. She provided additional details of Epstein's sexual abuse of her." (DE48 at 17.) And, one of Petitioners' counsel's other clients, S.R., was originally interviewed in October 2007 and refused to provide information regarding Epstein. (DE14 at It 7.) During the time that Epstein was