Epstein Secrets

1, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. (2) In or around 2001, Defendant SARAH ICELLEN led Jane Doe #2 from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at 358 El Brillo Way. (3) In or around 2001

in exchange for posing for nude photographs. (13) In or around 2003, Defendant SARAH KELLEN told Jane Doe #2 that auJant JEFFREY EPSTEIN had asked KELLEN to take nude photographs of Jane 1.J1 Doe #2. (14) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who w

a formal grant' E.g., United 7. As a part of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 Congress added the current scheme for statutory grants of use Immunity. currently co- III 13 U.S.C. §§ 6001.4005. and repealed other Immunity statutes. Including trap transactional immunity provisions, that had been s

ice Department ("PBPD") about pressing charges. PBPD began investigating the recipient of the massage, Jeffrey Epstein, and two of his assistants, Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova. PBPD identified 27 girls who went to EFTA00191389 Epstein's house to perform "massage service? (not including one licensed m

61 Thru P-007785 File folder entitled "EPSTEIN/KELLEN CELL PHONE RECORDS" containing documents receiv

still does not wish to testify in this case and has a Fifth Amendment basis for er position. She wishes not to accept the "proffer letter " cover of Immunity, which again is her right. I think it Is a waste of time to have her appear Friday to just take. the Fifth. I suggest that you huddle with your peo

were repeatedly questioned by Kuvin about whether the prince had been involved In sexual acts with any of Epstein 'a entourage of young women. Both Ellen and declined to answer the questions and instead took the Fifth Amendment, which allows their legal silence. Of course, there Is no evidence or su

tement from the prince about what he may or may not have seen while attending parties with Epstein. Though the prince is likely to claim diplomatic Immunity, that step win not keep his name out of the court papers or the headlines: it will just keep his presence out of the courtroom. The same thing goe