Epstein Secrets

with them. (b) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," NADIA MARCINKOVA, and other participants would make payments to, or cause payments to be made to, minor females in exchanger engaging in lewd conduct. (c) It was f

craft owned by JEGE, INC. (213) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriant ucinska," and NADIA 35 EFTA00191758 MARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, (214)

(213) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriant ucinska," and NADIA 35 EFTA00191758 MARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, (214) On or about February 21, 2005,

the evidence it pro- poses to use is derived from a legitimate source wholly independent" of the testimo- ny given under the grant of immunity. See Braswell v. United States, — US. —, 108 S.Ct. 2284, 2295, 101 LEd.2d 98 (1988); Kastigar, 406 U.S. at 460, 92 S.Ct at 1666. See also Murphy v. Waterfront C

orking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 17. Any and all docume

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, t

65 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id., at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, [487 U.S.,) at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; [ id.,] at 122, 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fift

orking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 17. Any and all docume

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, t

465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 123T Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id., at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, 1487 U.S..'! at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; J id.,1 at 122, 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fif

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 16 Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

465 U.S., at 613. and n. 11. 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher. 425 U.S., at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569; id. at 428. 432. 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. [487 U.S..1 at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; J id.] at 122. 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth