Epstein Secrets

orking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 17. Any and all docume

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, t

iguous Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 6 of 37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page6 circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

orking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Request No. 17. Any and all docume

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, t

00222079 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 6 of 37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 6 circumstances."). Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

irls to his mansion. Epstein's key "lieutenant" in the organization was MI who served as both his scheduler and a recruiter/procurer of the girls. Marcinkova also served as a recruiter and helped Epstein satisfy his criminal sexual desires by, on occasion, directly participating in sexual abuse and prost

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

to do with Jeffrey repay the money and w Epstein ever again.” That week, as part of the ongoing civil laws uits against Epstein, Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova are both asked about Prince Andrew’s relations with Epstein. 238 Fy “Would you agree with Epstein used to share under, len is asked. “On the ins

used to share under, len is asked. “On the instructions of invoke my Fifth Amendment “Have you ever been m; Andrew?” lawyers ask Marci’ “Fifth” is Nadia’s simple, That same week, the gover role as Great Britain’s royal t tenacious, and in the Telegr stories appear on a daily basi; ° The Duke, His Pa

must u can testify.” . invoke my Fifth Amendment privilege.” seal ° q : “Have you ever been made to perform sexually on Prince Andrew?” lawyers ask Marcinkova. “Fifth” is Nadia’s simple, succinct reply. embarrassments, many of which | That same week, the government downgrades Prince Andrew’s nds. The weddi

Donald Trump. How would you characterize the two men? ° Several people have described you as a very loyal friend. Is that a fair characterization? n Malloy, and I began work on ° I’ve heard that Leslie Wexner removed all photographs d to interview Jeffrey Epstein ' of you from his home. Given how close y