Epstein Secrets

asty (Jane Doe 3) and another woman (Jane Doe 4) as plaintiffs to that case.C132] The addition accused Alan Dershowitz of sexually abusing a minor, Jane Doe 3, provided by Epstein.D33] The allegations against Dershowim were stricken by the judge and eliminated from the case because he said they were outsid

ember29, 2018. zefessor Alan Dershowite.[8)(1421 Giuffre also cleimed that Eestein3Ylaxwell. .and others

1%cMANU-3 1/26/24,11:44,OA 6, 4 A ele5E &nail - Marling Rait (1•44 APPONYTMEWS "Pita) aporei , Cor3ThC≤ 11 Gmail boftt (A Paton or Cexi...w.- Cabot:ic it.) vlcrttiS Houle RF TRAtastAta.icAIS victim ts-nn-tAe,- DeNT tislAbri 'CO BE In/ fte...urrier-Z,Gry r Meeting peva OftcoT TC SE tent . 2 m

action based on the same operative allegations), Jane Doe #3 v. Epstein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed

e plaintiff cannot blame someone els for the consequences of her own criminal conduct. CI Fe/d & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfe, Rounick and Cabot, 458 A.2d 545, 552 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983) (holding that law-firm clients could not recover damages flowing from their own criminal acts, even though

FL 33160 16 For Jane Doe 17 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 18 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 19 Jane Doe 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 20 ISIDRO M. GARCIA, 21 Garcia Elkins Boehringer 224 Datura Avenue 22 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jane DOE II 23 RICHARD H. WILLI

tiff cannot blame someone else (= ) for the consequences of her own criminal conduct. Cf. Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfe, Rounick and Cabot, 458 A.2d 545, 552 (Pa. Super. Ct, 1983) (holding that law-firm clients could not recover damages flowing from their own criminal acts, even though

action based on the same operative allegations), Jane Doe #3 v. Epstein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed

tiff cannot blame someone else ( ) for the consequences of her own criminal conduct. Cf. Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick and Cabot, 458 A.2d 545, 552 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983) (holding that law-firm clients could not recover damages flowing from their own criminal acts, even though

action based on the same operative allegations), Jane Doe #3 v. Epstein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed

aintiff cannot blame someone else (= for the consequences of her own criminal conduct. CI Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfe, Rounick and Cabot, 458 A.2d 545, 552 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983) (holding that law-firm clients could not recover damages flowing from their own criminal acts, even though