Epstein Secrets

See also 6/2/2017 Villafafia Decl. atilt 6-13, 15, 19-21, 25, 33- 34, 38; 2d Kuyrkendall Decl. at fi 8-9; DE361-62. Furthermore, with regard to Ms. Giuffre and Jane Doe 5, one had informed the FBI that she did not want to be bothered again about the Epstein matter and the other had refused to speak to

d language does not appear in Exhibit 4; it appears at DE361-5. 36. The government admits paragraph 36 but notes that Exhibit 2 is not an email to Humberto Ocariz; the referenced email appears at DE361-3. The second sentence of paragraph 36 is admitted. 37. Admitted. 38. The Government admits that on Septemb

See also 6/2/2017 Villafafia Decl. atilt 6-13, 15, 19-21, 25, 33- 34, 38; 2d Kuyrkendall Decl. at fi 8-9; DE361-62. Furthermore, with regard to Ms. Giuffre and Jane Doe 5, one had informed the FBI that she did not want to be bothered again about the Epstein matter and the other had refused to speak to

d language does not appear in Exhibit 4; it appears at DE361-5. 36. The government admits paragraph 36 but notes that Exhibit 2 is not an email to Humberto Ocariz; the referenced email appears at DE361-3. The second sentence of paragraph 36 is admitted. 37. Admitted. 38. The Government admits that on Septemb

have a history of working diligently on behalf of victims of crime. While at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of West Virginia, I was a part of the prosecution team that prosecuted the first case in the country under the federal Violence Against Women Act. United States v. B

entative" to an independent third party, AUSA had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz and claimed he had been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." account was misleading, as it omitted that this "good friend" wa

ndependent third party, AUSA Marie Villafana had already proposed an “attorney representative.” She - had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he had been recommended by a “good friend in the Appellate Division.” Ms. Villafana’s account was misleading, as it omitted that this

394 ‘ORGE G. RI r Gepraoe ST ERE CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA 25333-3304 REBECCA A. BETTS oehiae 500 LEE STREET