Epstein Secrets

Paneling Inc. Civil No. ST-10-CV-443 Memorandum Opinion Page 2 of 11 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, a resident of the Virgin Islands,2 is the sole member of Plaintiff L.S.J., LLC. L.S.J.3 owns Little St. James, which is an island off of the southeast coast of St. Thomas. In 2005, E

nstallation of the cabinets, in performance of its contract with Molyneux, were to benefit Epstein and L.S.J., and would be used in a library in the Virgin Islands.' On July 30, 2010, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action, alleging that the cabinetry installation had not been properly completed, that t

iction is proper under section 4903(a)(2). All that is required to satisfy section 4903(a)(2) is that a "contract be performed, at least in part, in the virgin Islands and that the cause of action arise out of the contract."31 If a defendant knows that the ultimate destination of its goods will be the Virgin Island

risdiction, the omission will not defeat jurisdiction if the facts alleged satisfy the jurisdictional requirements of the statute ... °Ashcroft v. Iqbal, — US. —,129 S. Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009) OtilfulthIR " gift to assume as true well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint for the purpose of deci

n paragraphs 14 and 16, Defendant displayed a myriad of photographs of underage girls throughout his homes in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up throughout his home in P

at "Twombly expounded the pleading standard for 'all civil actions' and not just pleadings made in the context of an antitrust dispute," Ashcroft'. Iqbal No. 07-1015 (U.S. May 18, 2009) (slip op. at 20) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 1), the need to enforce these pleading requirements is especially acute in

der to coerce the plaintiff into compliance. Amended complaint paragraph 48 and 50. For example, while being transported to Epstein's island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Epstein, Maxwell, and took possession of the plaintiff's passport in order to coerce her to comply with their demands, including their demands th

0 21 22 23 24 25 that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 667 (2009). While the Court should construe the factual allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, "the tenet that a