Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to promise such a concurrent sentence); Ex pane Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 514-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (h
tering into a settlement agreement.")); United States Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States, BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to promise such a concurrent sentence); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 514-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (h
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to promise such a concurrent sentence); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 514-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (h
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to promise such a concurrent sentence); Er parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 514-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (h
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to promise such a concurrent sentence); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 514-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (h
ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (171)
Entities connected to both Marc Rich and N. Am. Inc.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON22,722 w/ Marc·8 w/ N.
LB
Leon Black
PERSON2,099 w/ Marc·3 w/ N.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON1,198 w/ Marc·7 w/ N.
George W. Bush
PERSON853 w/ Marc·5 w/ N.
Joe Biden
PERSON722 w/ Marc·6 w/ N.
United States
LOCATION626 w/ Marc·7 w/ N.
Prince Charles
PERSON497 w/ Marc·6 w/ N.
New York
LOCATION348 w/ Marc·5 w/ N.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON338 w/ Marc·7 w/ N.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON338 w/ Marc·6 w/ N.
Sarah Kellen
PERSON335 w/ Marc·4 w/ N.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON293 w/ Marc·5 w/ N.
Michael Douglas
PERSON235 w/ Marc·5 w/ N.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON209 w/ Marc·6 w/ N.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON196 w/ Marc·7 w/ N.
the Southern District
LOCATION172 w/ Marc·6 w/ N.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON162 w/ Marc·6 w/ N.
New Hampshire
LOCATION156 w/ Marc·5 w/ N.
Paul Cassell
PERSON154 w/ Marc·7 w/ N.
RU
Rubin
PERSON150 w/ Marc·5 w/ N.