Epstein Secrets

at questioned whether Mr. Epstein would receive a rich man's justice. AUSA then stated that, in fact,

er CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney'

ers of traditionally state concern, will continue to arise and will be answered case-by-case. As Justice O'Connor said in her dissent in Gonzales'. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 47 (2005), ". . . the task is to identify a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than every

LE slabIle&elcourIlawcorn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN [email protected] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th

ers of traditionally state concern, will continue to arise and will be answered case-by-case. As Justice O'Connor said in her dissent in Gonzales I Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 47 (2005), ". . . the task is to identify a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate more than nothing ... and less than every

elcourew.com RENATO E. STABILE FabliSokswilawoom FAITH A. FRIEDMAN IM•cimweelcoutlaw.com BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h

berg= Roy Black Cake Haan gene Loa Mclean Mu rich Ban Pranciaca Wahblarne, D.C. eSed >1 ti'lat

defense counsel has reserved the right to challenge such litigation). 8. The ability to negotiate effectively. Letter dated October 25, 2007, from First Assistant United States Attorney to the Honorable Edward B. Davis (Ret), attached hereto as Exhibit B. 14. The attorney representative recommended by the Sp

at questioned whether Mr. Epstein would receive a rich man's justice. AUSA Weinstein then stated that,

rom former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mils case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States A

e wanted to make $200 giving a massage to a very rich man on Palm Beach. illemdelnibegan arguing becaus

bject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval f

onna go over there. And she told me that it was a rich guy and she was saying oh my God, he’s so rich, b

to comply with the terms ol the Non-Prosecution Agreement by November 8, 2007, Sincerely, R, Alexander Acosta United States Attomey Jeffrey Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney ee! R, Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attomey AUSA A. Marie Villafaia HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012207 Id) 063 TAB 3 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012208

that if you did this 5 every weekend you'd be rich, didn't you? 6 A. No. That's what Lold me. 7

whom the United States believes it has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them was a victim of an enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see Decembe