Epstein Secrets

arry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. Lehtinen, U.S. Atty., and Susan Hill P002011, As

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22 —p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he had

AM FILED BY BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. RE:NON PARTY E W.'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SEALING AND UNSEAL RECO

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22— p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he had

June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Uns

is some compelling government interest and that's going to require an evidentiary hearing. So I have no great objection to filing the Request for Closure and then having a hearing in front of the Court. (Supp.A.-1 at p. 3,1. 22 — p. 4,1. 5.) Importantly, Petitioner's counsel did not assert that he ha