Epstein Secrets

letin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. 1 at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6; and January 2004, Vol. 1, No. 1, at I, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney General Ashcroft, and former Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human

l. 1, No. 1, at I, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney Gene

OVT EFTA00310837 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Kenneth W. Starr To Call Writer Directly-. VIA FACSIMILE

t was an "important" "purpose of the travel, a significant motivating factor", or in other words, more than merely incidental. See United States v. Horschauer, 2007 WL 979931 (116 Cir. 2007) (unpublished). We understand from conversations with Ms. hat she believes that Mr. Epstein was and is a resident o

etin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. 1 at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6,. and January 2004, Vol. 1, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney General Ashcroft, and former Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human

l. 1, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney Gene

t was an "important" "purpose of the travel, a significant motivating factor", or in other words, more than merely incidental. See United States v. Horschauer, 2007 WL 979931 (11°' Cir. 2007) (unpublished). We understand from conversations with hat she believes that Mr. Epstein was and is a resident of N

letin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. I at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6; and January 2004, Vol. I, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney General Ashcroft, and fonner Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human

l. I, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney Gene

t was an "important" "purpose of the travel, a significant motivating factor", or in other words, more than merely incidental. See United States v. Horschauer, 2007 WL 979931 (1 e h Cir. 2007) (unpublished). We understand from conversations with Ms. Villafaiia that she believes that Mr. Epstein was and is