Epstein Secrets

9 complaint against Bradley Edwards that III., E.W. or 24 Jane Doe voluntarily consented to their s

n't have any further 15 A Yes. 25 questions. 16 Q Right. And I bet it was a shock to you 16 REDIRECT EXAMINATION 13 that ho was running a Ponzl scram, because nowhere 17 BY KR. SCAROLA: IS in your mind would you have thought that was 10 0 Ara there any other sections of this 19 possib

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

good faith and with the bests interests of their clients In mind at all times when in reality, they were acting in furtherance of the investment or Ponzl scheme described herein. EPSTEIN justifiably relied to his detriment on the representations of RRA, and Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and as to h

ted States in United States of America I Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

", but were being contacted, subpoenaed or listed to harass and Intimidate them and Epstein, and to add "star" appeal to the marketing effort of the Ponzl scheme. EFTA00193829 Epstelni. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS,