Epstein Secrets

ant to motions to unseal, filed by non-parties, E.W., B.B. and Palm Beach Newspapers d/b/a The Palm B

ourt erred in concluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (k1.)

red to by proper name. Non-party interveners, E.W., B.B. and The Post are referred to as E.W., B.B.

filed a motion in the state criminal action on May 12, 2009, seeking to intervene and unseal the non-prosecution agreement and addendum pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d)(5) (A-10). E.W. alleged that the proper procedures had not been followed in sealing the documents (A-10). E.W. claimed these documents are

FL 33401 William Berger, Esq. Attorney For: E. W. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 E. Las Olas Blvd

7). 15 Statutes § 69.081(4), Florida Statutes 13 Rules Administrative Order 2.303-9/08 12 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2) 14 Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 in passim Constitutional Provisions Art. I, §24(a), Fla. Const. 10 09112/2019 CONFIDENTIAL PSge 35 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDN