Epstein Secrets

15. Geiselman, R. E. & Padilla, J. (1988). Cognitive interviewing with child witnesses. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 236-242. George, R. C. & Clifford, B. R. (1992). Making the most of witnesses. tP ithigi , 8, 185-198. George, R. C. & Clifford, B. R. (1996). The Cognitive Intervi

5614263.2013.827835. Anderson, R.C. & Pichert, J.W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable informa

n exchange ideas using only the verbal medium, but some people are more expressive non-verbally, and some events are better described non-verbally (Leibowitz, Guzy, Peterson, & Blake, 1993). Ideally the response format should be compatible with the witness's mental record of the event, thereby minimizing

Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-412. George, R. C. & Clifford, B. (1992). Making the most of witnesses. Policing, 8, 185-198. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performanc

. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 91, 69-78. Cote, W. & Simpson, R. (2000). Covering violence: A guide

um to communicate. Some people, however, can express themselves more effectively non-verbally, and some events are easier to describe non-verbally (Leibowitz, Guzy, Peterson, & Blake, 1993). Ideally the response format should be compatible with the witness's mental record of the event, thereby minimizing

STA WItTn)STArat177OAlkele 9.21anSDELE Kenneth W. Starr, Beg Kirkland & Ellis LLP TV South Figuer

u to confer with your co-counsel regarding this matter. Although the language of Paragraph S could be so construed. our First Assistant 'donned Mr. Leibowitz some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Lefieowitz has noted, were Mr. F.pstein conviaed at trial, the plaintiff-viefims in a subseque

STArat177OAlkele oariEty SYPFS);SIMILFy Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis UP Re. ,kffrev Eps

u to confer with your co-counsel regarding this matter. Although the language of Paragraph S could be so construed. our First Assistant 'donned Mr. Leibowitz some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Lefieowitz has noted, were Mr. F.pstein conviaed at trial, the plaintiff-viefims in a subseque