Epstein Secrets

1 305.358.2800 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 We

ME TRANSCRIPTION EFTA00192950 Case 9:08-cv-80119-MM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page 25 of 51 25 1 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your 2 rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages 3 above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done i

1 305.358.2800 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 We

Docket 06/02/2017 Page 157 of 176 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page25of51 2 1 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your 2 rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages 3 above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done i

or Jane Doe 101 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 We

2019 CONFIDENTIAL Page 34 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331730 EFTA_00204456 EFTA02729441 25 1 2 3 4 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages above the minimum statutory amount. The only thing that he has done is in hi

I ea:1 ye. app 20 A. 21 0- en i's going to tot YOU • Ls 22 Oolstions. msso, gaisttoes ted.y. If at any alma you 23 ..44.4 to talc. • break. W. rut lot.. •••••• Mai? 24 A. 25 0. If you at cay tine don't understood on. of Ph fax. 1655 PS Beach lace, Ohl.. Sute 913 • Wen GOVERNMENT E

ket 06/24/2009 Page 25 of 51 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages above the minimum statutory amount. The only thing that he has done is in hi

For Jane Doe 101 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. 6 Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 25 We

E TRANSCRIPTION EFTA00180328 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page 25 of 51 25 1 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your 2 rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages 3 above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done i

or Jane Doe 101 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 We

minimums, of course, he can contest that in any TOTAL ACCESS COURTROOM NETWORK REALTIME TRANSCRIPTION EFTA00184057 25 1 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your 2 rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages 3 above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done i

1 305.358.2800 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 We

ANSCRIPTION EFTA00231639 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 1 2 3 Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page25of51 25 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done is in

or Jane Doe 101 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 We

E TRANSCRIPTION EFTA00232759 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page 25 of 51 25 1 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your 2 rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages 3 above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done i

ed in this 10 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue in additi

statutory minimums, of course, he can contest that in any TOTALACCESSCOUMOU4NEDNORKREAMMETRANSOUrrION EFTA00233704 25 1 way that is proper under the Rules of Evidence and your 2 rulings. The NPA has no limitation on his contesting damages 3 above the minimum statutory amount. 4 The only thing that he has done i