Epstein Secrets

7th Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 W. Chester Brewer, Jr. One Clearlake Center Suite

PROSECUTION (App. 32, 41) (original emphasis). The footnote in question did not, and could not, raise a point on appeal. See Simkins Ind., Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 714 So. 2d 1092, 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) ("an argument in a footnote does not elevate the matter to a point on appeal."); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

* WINO HENgs BROLNDS WINO& J. rant I N DAVID W. BROWN JEANETTE 6. CHAN YWIMEIET. • CHAN LEWIS

tomotive Inc. v.. Paso Corp., 4 Extrinsic evidence is always admissible to determine whether a contract was negotiated. See ConAgra Foods, Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co., --- A.3d ---, 2011 WL 1599621, at *8 (Del. Apr. 28, 2011) (refusing to apply contra proferentem before consideration of extrinsic evidence for the

of normal adolescent ideals." (Emphasis Added). W. Epstein is also entitled to know, among other thi

ement with the United States Attorney's Office to not contest liability for claims brought exclusively 'See also Bray & Gillespie Management LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2008 WL 4826115, 1 (M.D. Fla. 2008) — "Wile Court 'may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial sy