Epstein Secrets

rms the basis of the "facts" set forth in ¶ 80, in which Edwards cites the affidavit of Michael Fisten (Ex. QQ), an investigator who recounted what George Rush, a New York Daily News reporter, told Fisten what Epstein had said in an interview with Rush. EDWARDS' "FACTS" PERTAINING TO OTHER PURPORTED A

5, 357 (Ha. 1s' DCA 1996); Albelo v. Southern Bell, 682 So.2d 1126, 1129 (Ha. 4'h DCA 1996). Finally, summary judgments are not favored. O'Connor v. Marston, 717 So. 2d 82 (Ha. 5th DCA, 1998). It is also necessary for the movant to authenticate the undisputed facts upon which its claim for summary judg

01.Inea C. othantroi Cosa 0 0 dew WOla dIN all W. OCOral In oidSO tad* any Obloodons. anfrocIno P

tor ben robrornsd by as pares law earl et tart 20days too. a w r•N scnstir.ryd rowing On& o. The pans a anettatore wet traltelb mcRole • near 01 Marston *no errs a ono draw am the rocas nausea. 1. Ds ram of eon as brats" forcer nay Mow wee ant. lot baba. a stein on ortarab In taro ores. • arts Mr

undo] this protection 4 WO ninon as of De0Erfte W. 2013 Steed to the poky arditiorn and antateos ed

nents mind h neat CONFIDENTIAL tontines —you inn *dm heusehollrg by Ming your Ending Adv6Or Friendly tetra name TOFrierelry account none ref kas Marston dot you entered on the hmscoline notes webs.. It e a customize:o •noname chosen by you to az6t you wth your ritanditepn9 m M no boy vffei on your

alatilifmees and gums" new boat de s701.1.11,040, W. RVC1192C sheer ae :bee rIn Xt.. an MK Mt Itare a

deposrtS arra (Tern in A., :,:taterne,IIS with oOnesoonang et liiea ai you, cteckboa It he NO balances still do not match. veil with all documents Marston *Wei vox h ak el O Inc a your Hone Equey tee am: accost shwaere teary Wird io hFrest Rak Fnrce Gages siva te contued mizeg te Average Ody Ear..e