Epstein Secrets

as to confer a benefit on the third party." Fla. W. Intl Ainvays, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d at 1228 (quot

Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's reliance on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C

as to confer a benefit on the third party." Fla. W. Intl Ainvays, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d at 1228 (quot

Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's reliance on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C

er for the consideration of the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, the United States District Judge who was t

Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's relianTI on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C

as to confer a benefit on the third party." Fla. W. Intl Ainvays, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d at 1228 (quot

Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's reliance on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C