7
Total Mentions
7
Documents
399
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
EFTA00599472
Company's sole and exclusive property and shall be deemed to be Confidential Information. All originals, copies, reproductions and summaries of the Confidential Materials shall be delivered by Employee to the Company immediately upon termination or expiration of Employee's engagement with the Company for any reason,
EFTA01962678
epresents and warrants that he is not aware of any person or entity that is in unauthorized or wrongful possession of any Confidential Information, Confidential Materials (both as defined below), or other property of Company, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or the Individuals. 4. Restrictive Covenants. 4.1 a.
EFTA01733589
its obligations in the process, whenever it chooses to do so. • Additionally, the provisions in Section 4.2 that "No Confidential Information or Confidential Materials shall be used by Dr. Nikolic except as expressly authorized by the Company" and that "Dr. Nikolic shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of an
EFTA00102999_sub_001 - EFTA00102999_100
Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's reliance on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C
EFTA00077606_sub_001 - EFTA00077606_100
Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's reliance on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C
EFTA00039421_sub_001 - EFTA00039421_100
Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's reliance on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C
EFTA00095067_sub_001 - EFTA00095067_100
Judge McMahon found that because Maxwell's relianTI on the protective order in that case as a "shield [. . .] from the court-ordered disclosure of Confidential Materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena was unreasonable, the Court may exercise its discretion to grant the Government's application." (Id. at 22). The C
Rahimi
PersonSurname reference in documents

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)

Adriana Ross
PersonPolish former model and Epstein associate, named as unindicted co-conspirator in 2007 plea deal, invoked Fifth Amendment in depositions
Joe Recarey
PersonFormer Palm Beach Police detective who led the original investigation of Jeffrey Epstein (died 2018)

George W. Bush
PersonPresident of the United States from 2001 to 2009
Adam Walsh
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Learned Hand
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Thom v. Ashcroft
PersonName reference in documents
Greenburgh Centr
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Michael Casey
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Rochin
PersonSurname reference in documents
Ponce Inlet
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Bryson v. United States
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Kungys v. United States
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Ashburn
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Loera
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Raymonda
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Schafrick
LocationLocation referenced in documents
Sergentakis
LocationLocation referenced in documents