Epstein Secrets

ENNEY •EARL L DENIES JO BRENDA S. ROUSES JAMES W. OUSTAFSOK JR. JACK P. Ili DAVID IL KELLEY. a.

Based on this information, Edwards reasonably pursued the flight logs in discovery. 80. In the fall of 2009, Epstein gave a recorded interview to George Rush, a reporter with 29 EFTA00188894 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM i.s4culnegt 291-15 Ent Case 09 34791 - Doc ° 160405er°Priledn0Fa1 figtgitlyMa5 Page

e Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 52510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

1, 2010 by and between Bradley J. Edwards. Scott W. Rothstein, Marc Nurik, Cara Holmes, Mike Piston

he Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipie

red to by proper name. Non-party interveners, E.W., B.B. and The Post are referred to as E.W., B.B.

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud, Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing

t's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerful country in the world. There were two at

ounting the overarching principle that “t]he public shall have access to all records of the judicial branch of government, except as provided below.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(a). This rule is a codification of the Florida Supreme Court’s admonition that a “a strong presumption of openness exists for all court

order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unse

o motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (c)(9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954 So. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing

of Judicial Administration 2.420(d)(5) (A-10). E.W. alleged that the proper procedures had not been

to motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential in accordance with subdivision (cX9)."); see also In re Amendments to Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420--Sealing of Court Records & Dockets, 954.. 2d 16, 17 & 23 (Fla. 2007) (declining to adopt specific procedure regarding the sealing of