Epstein Secrets

e captioned lawsuit. 8. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in the captioned lawsuit.

orneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. 11. "Fanner Jaffe" means the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, ■., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, at

along with Fanner Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, the "Bankruptcy Movan

show cause proceedings and depositions, and in support thereof, states: INTRODUCTION Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), along with Fanner Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, the "Bankruptcy Movants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a N

e captioned lawsuit. 8. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein, a defendant in the captioned lawsuit.

orneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. 11. "Fanner Jaffe" means the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors,

leged communications, State Circuit Judge Donald W. Hafele said, "The critical question, though, is w

er Jaffe Wcissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL said in its March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Fanner Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of the confidential documents and

l Jay Howell & Associates Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney Coll

PTER 11 Debtor. NOTICE OF JOINT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Movants, Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., hereby voluntarily dismiss their respective Motion's for Contempt against Jeffrey

e. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion f

of the Amended Exhibit List in the state court in March 2018. There is not even an allegation that Fowler White used the documents on the disk which Fanner Jaffe claims to be privileged. The worst that can be said is that a CD sat unused in Fowler White's files. Farmer Jaffe and Bradley Edwards seek sanction

ail: [email protected] Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00795944

after "the Epstein lawsuit"). The result of that subpoena was the production from the RRA trustee of approximately 27,000 emails to be delivered to Fanner Jaffe for the review and creation of a privilege log. On November 30, 2010, this Court ordered Epstein to bear the costs of the printing and Bates Number

es only) Attorney E-Mail: Attorneys for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe EFTA00795926

Cause Hearing, as it is Edwards' position that only one (1) day is required. Edwards reasonably believes that this view is shared by, at a minimum, Fanner Jaffe and the Intervenors. Thus, rescheduling will conserve Court resources, as a single day should be sufficient. Conclusion Given the foregoing, Edwar

tion. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. B

Stacey Swim best*. S filing a Lawsuit for Senually Assault by • Mange Therapist Mip Wans,pstMogette.conYtlogitaVI witSlifengakWwwl losiestraft Fanner Jaffe Weaning Ape 29 )ob us In wishing Farmer Jaffe WetsSing - Gary Farmer a Happy aftbdayl is Rae Sterner Moore Hey WI, bob Se a gixograpii Wry prote