Epstein Secrets

YE, J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PAN GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. P.A. BERNAR

e 5 of 8 the objection 'so general and sweeping in nature" that they aamount[ed] to a blanket assertion of the privilege: Id. p.11. In the instant Motion for Reconsideration, Epstein has set forth additional facts and detailed reasoning successfully demonstrating how forcing him to answer these requests would realistica

W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE

0, 2015. The required Notice of Service was never filed with the Court in respect of that attempt, which you, yourself, conceded in your later filed Motion for Reconsideration was improper service. After rescheduling the hearing on Mr. Epstein's April 29, 2015 Motion to Quash four separate times, you failed to appear at th

7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 W. Chester Brewer, Jr. W. Chester Brewer, Jr., P.A.

, FL 33301. EFTA00613846 Reconsideration. Three months later, Edwards has filed this purported "supplemental authority" in support of his initial Motion for Reconsideration. However, this supplemental authority" does nothing more than establish the fact that another trial court, just as this Court did in the case at h

d accordingly. Very truly yours, EFTA00625033 W. Chester Brewer, Jr., P.A. EFTA00625034

March 10, 2015. In that attempt the required Notice of Service was never filed with the Court, and which you, yourself, agreed in your later filed Motion for Reconsideration was an improper service. After rescheduling the hearing on Mr. Epstein's Motion to Quash, filed on April 29, 2015, and on four different occasions,

been found, the party whose tax return information has been requested has the burden to "provide alternative sources for this sensitive information. W. If the requested information is available from alternate sources, disclosure should not be compelled. Potential alternate sources to which the cour

ED OBJECTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Reconsideration and/or for Request Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Portions of the Magistrate's Order (DE 462) pursuant to Rule 60, Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4, Rule 4(c) and