Epstein Secrets

AEL FISTEN, individually, L.M., individually, E.W., individually, and JANE DOE, individually Defen

ress conferences. The most recent estimate of the financial scope of the scheme is as much as $1 billion dollars. 49. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a recent article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He state

EFTA00725295 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 8 E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB), (h

ress conferences. The most recent estimate of the financial scope of the scheme is as much as $1 billion dollars. 30. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a recent article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He state

l Paralegal Paralegal Investigator Referred E.W. case against Epstein Appellate attorney from Uta

arson Stevin Levin Ira Sochet Mark Melvin Jack Samoney Lawrence King Steve Jackel Michael Legamaro Kevin Draber David Boden Andrew Barnett Alan Sakowitz Mark Nurik Mark Fistos Tommy Mottola Officer Recarey Interviewed by Michael Fisten Investigator FBI Agent FBI Agent US Attorney Rothstein's

United States in United States of America'. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Sta

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with. ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious.

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United State

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

ted States in United States of America I Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions, 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009. article as saying that he had met with, ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious.

nited States in United States of America I. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H