Epstein Secrets

012 reply attached copies of the complaints in E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein (Exhibit A), and L.M. v. Jeffr

uestion of law to be decided by this Court. "Statutory interpretation is a matter of law appropriate for resolution on summary judgment." Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 631 F.3d 1153, 1160 (10th Cir. 2011)(citation omitted). "Issues of statutory interpretation and other matters of law may be decided on motion for su

012 reply attached copies of the complaints in E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein (Exhibit A), and L.M. v. Jeffr

uestion of law to be decided by this Court. "Statutory interpretation is a matter of law appropriate for resolution on summary judgment." Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 631 F.3d 1153, 1160 (10th Cir. 2011)(citation omitted). "Issues of statutory interpretation and other matters of law may be decided on motion for su

By: /s/ Deputy Clerk Copies to: Hon. Geoffrey W. Barnard Gregory H. Hodges, Esq. Maria Tankenson

the plaintiffs for the loans that are the subject of this litigation — and therefore, are subject to this Court's general jurisdiction. See, e.g., Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 F.3d at 569 (finding that "our review of general jurisdiction cases reveals that contacts are commonly assessed over a period of years prior t