Epstein Secrets

pstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY.64,Nu. F(31 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2007). At the time she tiled Detective Recarey's affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material misrepresentations, including gross misstatements of witness statements and other evidence. Secon

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

d serious misrepresentations before a court. On July 31, 2007, in the grand-jury litigation arising out of this case, she filed the "Declaration of Joseph Recarey," attaching the state detective's affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 an

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

on's theory of the case and the plea negotiations. 45. Mr. Thomas's calls to the USAO initially were referred to Assistant United States Attorney David Weinstein. AUSA Weinstein informed Mr. Thomas that federal authorities were considering charging Mr. Epstein under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422 and 2423, and tol

estigation involved intent with many of the same witnesses. We are aware that at least one federal interview 1 ) was recorded. We understand that Detective Recarcy provided his police report and certain affidavits to the federal authorities but did not provide the actual witness statements of the taped intervie

ftPI): told me to say I was IS because said . . . if you're not then he [Epstein' won't really let you in his house. So I said I was Ir. Detective Recarey. however. largely ignored these critical admissions in his Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit. Q: At any time. did he speak to you and does

Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Pane Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and er pane, so no one should have access t

ions, but also sharing with him details about your Office's theory concerning what laws you believe Mr. Epstein has violated. In broad strokes, Mr. David Weinstein told Mr. Thomas that the Office was contemplating charging Mr. Epstein under Sections 2422(b) (with a full discussion of principal liability), 2423,

n to the press at the same time that he publicly called for federal authorities to prosecute Mr. Epstein. The raw police reports included Detective Joseph Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcriptions

ghly inaccurate transcriptions of the witnesses' actual recorded statements, rife with glaring misquotes and misleading omissions. It was Detective Recarey who took the case to the EFTA00314859 FBI. These actions undermined the credibility of everything that followed in the federal investigation. Th

aring misquotes and misleading omissions. It was Detective Recarey who took the case to the EFTA00314859 FBI. The

y gave information about this case directly to the media—including to Landon Thomas, the senior business correspondent for the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein spoke about the case in great detail to Mr. Thomas, and, although the USAO refused to provide any of this information to Mr. Epstein's defense team

properly charge the case before presenting it for federal investigation and prosecution. In May 2006, I met with S/A Kuyrkendall and PBPD Detective Joe Recarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recare

ecarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal sexual conduct involving Epstein and his personal assistants. Briefly, Epstein, through his persona

I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal

ards, and E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall regarding further investigation B-118 2/29/2008 Entails betweenJeff Montan, Marie Villatafia, Robert Senior, and David Weinstein regarding continuing investigation and status of CEOS review B-119 3/12/2008 Email from E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall to Marie Villafafia re affidavit fo

d Jury’s indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department’s raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcriptio

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements

g out of this case, she filed the “Declaration of Joseph Recarey,” attaching the state detective’s affidavit in su

osecution’s theory of the case and the plea negotiations. Mr. Thomas’s calls to the USAO initially were referred to Assistant United States Attorney David Weinstein. AUSA Weinstein informed Mr. Thomas that federal authorities were considering charging Mr. Epstein under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422 and 2423, and told t