Epstein Secrets

pstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY.64,Nu. F(31 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2007). At the time she tiled Detective Recarey's affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material misrepresentations, including gross misstatements of witness statements and other evidence. Secon

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

d serious misrepresentations before a court. On July 31, 2007, in the grand-jury litigation arising out of this case, she filed the "Declaration of Joseph Recarey," attaching the state detective's affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 an

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

it has identified. Because the information provided by these women goes directly to the question of Mr. Epstein's guilt or innocence, it is classic Brady information. We understand that the U.S. Attorney might not want to disclose impeachment information about their witnesses prior to a charge or dur

n to the press at the same time that he publicly called for federal authorities to prosecute Mr. Epstein. The raw police reports included Detective Joseph Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcriptions

ghly inaccurate transcriptions of the witnesses' actual recorded statements, rife with glaring misquotes and misleading omissions. It was Detective Recarey who took the case to the EFTA00314859 FBI. These actions undermined the credibility of everything that followed in the federal investigation. Th

aring misquotes and misleading omissions. It was Detective Recarey who took the case to the EFTA00314859 FBI. The

each was astonished that any evidence Ms. Villafana purported to have was not shared with the State or made available to Mr Epstein's attorneys as Brady evidence. Ms. Villafana launched a totally unsupportable and vastly overreaching sex trafficking investigation without providing notification to th

I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal

properly charge the case before presenting it for federal investigation and prosecution. In May 2006, I met with S/A Kuyrkendall and PBPD Detective Joe Recarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recare

ecarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal sexual conduct involving Epstein and his personal assistants. Briefly, Epstein, through his persona

npersuaded by the letter and the presentation, but I agreed that I should carefully review transcripts of the recorded statements given to PBPD for Brady issues." Since witness credibility was clearly at the fore, I undertook efforts " The requested documents and items were never provided. 15 As the

R. Alexander Acosta December 17, 2007 Page 2 which includes but is not limited to Ms. testimony; the witness transcripts; the tainted Detective Recarey reports; and our prior su missions. In light of the concerns we raised and the evidence we discussed at the December 14 meeting, we are firmly persu

testimony; the witness transcripts; the tainted Detective Recarey reports; and our prior su missions. In light of t

ed to provide the draft indictment. We understand that we have no statutory right to a FBI 302 that inculpates Mr. Epstein (although we believe that Brady principles would encourage the disclosure of FBI 302 reports that exonerate him). We are concerned that there is information that could be rebutted

stigation of Clinton's relationship with an intern, would play rough. When the Palm Beach police started to identify victims, according to Detective Joe Recarey's report, Dershowitz began sending the detective Facebook and MySpace posts to demonstrate that some of these girls were no angels. Reiter's depositi

position also states that he heard from local private investigators that Dershowitz had launched background checks on both the police chief and Det. Recarey. Dershowitz denies all of that. According to Reiter, both he and Recarey also became aware that they were under surveillance for several months, wit

s representing criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked and t

home. We know that lead state police officers -- Detective Recarey and Police Chief Michael Reiter -- complained th

t, it appears that Epstein was tipped off before the execution of a search warrant at his home. We know that lead state police officers -- Detective Recarey and Police Chief Michael Reiter -- complained that the house was "sanitized" by the time they arrived to serve a search warrant for child pornograp

s representing criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked and t

l during their research. By then, relations between police and prosecutors were fraying. At a key meeting with prosecutors and the defense, Detective Joseph Recarey, the lead, investigator, was a no-show, according to Epsteins attorney. "The embarrassment on the.prosecutor’s face was evident when the police offic

rassment on the.prosecutor’s face was evident when the police officer never showed up for the meeting,” attorneyJack Goldberger said. Later in April, Recarey walked into a prosecutor’s office at the state attorney’s office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn. The prosecutor, Lanna Belohlavek

CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:27:00 PM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • • J8RsEPSl I he was deeply troubled by the alleged Brady violations. I represented the prosecutors in that case, so I'm very, very I familiar with it. It is analogous. It is a situation where there was trem

tried to hide something from the reviewers is false. I also take issue with the duplicity of stating that we must accept as true those parts of the Recarey reports and witness statements that you like and we must accept as false those parts that you do not like. You and your co-counsel also impressed u

ed to provide the draft indictmatt. We understand that we have no statutory right to a FRI 302 that inculpates Mr. Epstein (although we believe that Brady principles would encourage the disclosure of P131 302 reports that exonerate him). We are Lammed that there is information that could be rebutted i

Itmorahlt: R. Alexander Acosta December 17, 2007 Page 2 which includes but k not limited to Ms. testimony: the witness transcripts: the tainted Detective Kecarey reports: and our prior submissions. In light of the concerns we raised and the evidence we discussed al the December 14 meeting, we am firmly persua

ed to provide the draft indictment. We understand that ac have no statutory right to a FBI 302 that inculpates Mr. Epstein (although we believe that Brady principles would encourage the disclosure of FBI 302 reports that exonerate him). We are concerned that there is information that could be rebutted

s it has identified. Because the information provided by these women goes directly to the question of Mr. Epstein’s guilt or innocence, it is classic Brady information. We understand that the U.S. Attorney might not want to disclose impeachment information about their witnesses prior to a charge or durin

d Jury’s indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department’s raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcriptio

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements

g out of this case, she filed the “Declaration of Joseph Recarey,” attaching the state detective’s affidavit in su