Epstein Secrets

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

el, Esq. Andrew Lourie, Esq. A. Marie Villafthia, Esq. Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 25, 2007 Page 16 Pentek squarely denied being touched "inappropriately" or otherwise by Mr. Epstein: Q: Ile did not touch you inappropriately? A: No. (Pentek Statement a

ffirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of thcir true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted from the affidavit why she lied:

ve been presented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective Recarey of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPIT) and other state law enlbrcement officers. These interviews (the "witness statement() were olden ta

n statement. EFTA00176117 12/11/2007 11:38 FAX a 008/099 R. Alexander Acosta December I 1. 2007 Page 5 .m.••••• 2 I Intl was interviewed by Detective Itecarey twice, once by telephone, and once in Nrson. The portions of the Police Roan at which we refer speci0cally cite the inperson interview of l kill as

standing up and I just like. it was me kind of looking over my shoulder kinds smiling. and that was that." Sworn Statement of 10/11/05 at 35. 2 • Pentek Said Epstein Did Nat Touch I ler Inappropriately Detective Recarey recounts that rayth Penick advised that "Epstein grabbed her bullocks and pulled

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

vely misrepresented their ages as being 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Robson Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Laduke Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted from the affidavit why she