Epstein Secrets

pstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY.64,Nu. F(31 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2007). At the time she tiled Detective Recarey's affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material misrepresentations, including gross misstatements of witness statements and other evidence. Secon

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

d serious misrepresentations before a court. On July 31, 2007, in the grand-jury litigation arising out of this case, she filed the "Declaration of Joseph Recarey," attaching the state detective's affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 an

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

olations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b) and 2423(b). Since the limited review conducted by CEOS, two Supreme Court decisions—one authored by Justice Scalia and the other by Justice Thomas—have revitalized the bedrock principles that federal criminal statutes must be narrowly construed, that they may not

OUSE_OVERSIGHT_012346 ] (Thereupon, the following interview was had:) 2 DETECTIVE RECAREY: -- December 13th, 2005. 4 This ts 1D number -- Detective Joe Recarey with 4 the Town of Palm Beach Police Department. Present & is Detective Dawson with the Palm Beach Police fi Department. vy BY DEFECTIVE RECAREY:

e Recarey with 4 the Town of Palm Beach Police Department. Present & is Detective Dawson with the Palm Beach Police fi Department. vy BY DEFECTIVE RECAREY: ts Q Can you state your name tor the recard, please. 38 A 1 Q _ Spell it. please. Q Your date of birth? 14 A 15 Q How eld are you? i€ A Sevente

(Thereupon, the following interview was had:) 2 DETECTIVE RECAREY: -- December 13th, 2005. 4 This ts 1D number -- D

issue agreed that the President has "the power to veto encroaching laws . . . or even to disregard them when they are unconstitutional." Id, at 906 (Scalia, J., concurring); see also Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 635-38 (1952) (Jackson, J., concurring) (recognizing existence of Pre

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

olations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b) and 2423(b). Since the limited review conducted by CEOS, two Supreme Court decisions—one authored by Justice Scalia and the other by Justice Thomas—have revitalized the bedrock principles that federal criminal statutes must be narrowly construed, that they may not