Epstein Secrets

estigation involved intent with many of the same witnesses. We are aware that at least one federal interview 1 ) was recorded. We understand that Detective Recarcy provided his police report and certain affidavits to the federal authorities but did not provide the actual witness statements of the taped intervie

ftPI): told me to say I was IS because said . . . if you're not then he [Epstein' won't really let you in his house. So I said I was Ir. Detective Recarey. however. largely ignored these critical admissions in his Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit. Q: At any time. did he speak to you and does

Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Pane Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and er pane, so no one should have access t

s heing prosecuted by ('EOS. With that in mind, we welcome the upponanity to review 11w extensive research that CLOS bas done, as indicated by your Orrice. RFP MIA 000460 EFTA00208941 12/11/2007 11:48 FAX e021/099 • KiRKLAND & ELLIS LLP It. Alexander Acosta December I I, 2007 Page 18 the alle

same things that you had asked me to do earlier is improper meddling in civil litigation. Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00289827 JAY Pi LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 3 OF 5 already been submitted to the Office on several oc

Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Conn. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and expecte, so no one should have access t

Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00289827 JAY Pi

tter.' `Dave conferred with the AUSA rite nugotiated this language, and have been informed that parties intended this to address gas of venue. This Orrice wal not interpret this paragraph as my waiver of Subject matter jariselictiOn. Please Inform weir deflates counsel dila/fees oos EFTA00289816 12

ve been presented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective Recarey of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPIT) and other state law enlbrcement officers. These interviews (the "witness statement() were olden ta

n statement. EFTA00176117 12/11/2007 11:38 FAX a 008/099 R. Alexander Acosta December I 1. 2007 Page 5 .m.••••• 2 I Intl was interviewed by Detective Itecarey twice, once by telephone, and once in Nrson. The portions of the Police Roan at which we refer speci0cally cite the inperson interview of l kill as

will be served by the Following procedure ... Epstein understands that the United Stales Attorney has no authority to require the Slate Attorney's Orrice to abide by any terms of this agreement. lipstein understands that it is his EFTA00176127 12/11/2007 11:42 FAX la019/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP f