Epstein Secrets

ble and triple hearsay directed toward filing charges against a defendant named See A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida State Attorney msly rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (which sought to charge as

lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida Sta

supporting reasons. See People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d at 572 (reversing SORA order where defendant and court did not receive proper 10-day notice of People's revised RAI); cf. People v. Jordan, 31 A.D.3d 1196, 1196 (4th Dep't 2006) (holding People's failure to provide sufficient notice of revised RAI was

rior to the SORA hearing, the actual transcripts of the interviews on which the Board materials were purportedly based reveal that Palm Beach Det. Joseph Recarey, the affiant of the Probable Cause Affidavit, inaccurately summarized and repeatedly mischaracterized information that he swore under oath came fro

ear-old victim" in the Probable Cause Affidavit and the Board's Case Summary, the actual transcripts of A.D.'s November 8, 2005 interview with Det. Recarey make clear that A.D. was indisputably 17 by the time events "escalated" from massages to "sexual conduct," as defined under New York's Penal Law:

order to improperly and incorrectly build a case that Appellant had a propensity for underage girls. Indeed, the Probable Cause Affidavit and the People's appellate brief both underscore the extremely damaging claim that Appellant allegedly relayed to H.R. that his preference for female masseuses was,

hearsay directed toward filing charges against a defendant named Sarah Kellen. See A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida State Attorney expressly rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (which sought to charge

lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida Sta

supporting reasons. See People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d at 572 (reversing SORA order where defendant and court did not receive proper 10-day notice of People's revised RAI); cf. People v. Jordan, 31 A.D.3d 1196, 1196 (4th Dep't 2006) (holding People's failure to provide sufficient notice of revised RAI was

t submitted by police to the Florida prosecutor. See A.65 (Board Recommendation); A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). The allegations, even when aggregated, were not deemed by the Florida prosecutor who reviewed them to constitute sufficient "p

lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). The allegations, even when

nd review a written statement of the People's recommended determination and order where defendant and court did not receive proper 10-day notice of People's revised RAI); ef. People v. Jordan, 31 A.D.3d 1196, 1196 (4th Dep't 2006) (holding People's failure to provide sufficient notice of revised RAI was