Epstein Secrets

d before me this 1" day of May, 2006 by Det Joe Recarey, who is personally known to inc. Signature of Po

d stating that she had no direct contact with Epstein The foregoing instrument was sworn to or affirmed before me this l w day of May, 2006 by bet Joe Recarey, who is personally known to me. Signature of Police filet (F.S.S. 117.10) State of Florida Coun of Palm Beach Signatur Date: 05/01/2006 g Offi

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

home. We know that lead state police officers -- Detective Recarey and Police Chief Michael Reiter -- complained th

t, it appears that Epstein was tipped off before the execution of a search warrant at his home. We know that lead state police officers -- Detective Recarey and Police Chief Michael Reiter -- complained that the house was "sanitized" by the time they arrived to serve a search warrant for child pornograp

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

massage and at one point she climbed onto the massage The foregoing instrument was sworn to or affirmed before me this 1" day of May, 2006 by Pet Joe Reearey, who is personally known tome. Alt Signature of Police Office (F.S.S. 117.10) Date: 05/0 /2006 State of Florida County of Palm Be h Signatur> A

epartment - Probable Cause Affidavit of Det. Joe Recarey - Defendant dated May 1, 2006 A6 Palm Beach Sh

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting