Epstein Secrets

ble and triple hearsay directed toward filing charges against a defendant named See A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida State Attorney msly rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (which sought to charge as

lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida Sta

ommentary (2006) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00792349 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A

rior to the SORA hearing, the actual transcripts of the interviews on which the Board materials were purportedly based reveal that Palm Beach Det. Joseph Recarey, the affiant of the Probable Cause Affidavit, inaccurately summarized and repeatedly mischaracterized information that he swore under oath came fro

ear-old victim" in the Probable Cause Affidavit and the Board's Case Summary, the actual transcripts of A.D.'s November 8, 2005 interview with Det. Recarey make clear that A.D. was indisputably 17 by the time events "escalated" from massages to "sexual conduct," as defined under New York's Penal Law:

g reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration

ed. What I would respond to that is that the report -- and I showed Mr. a slightly better, unredacted version of page 86 of an incident report of Detective Recarey from the Palm Beach Police -- reflected that the date of the complaints by the parents was May 22 or May 23, 2008. It was the week that Mr. Epstei

on of page 86 of an incident report of Detective Recarey from the Palm Beach Police -- reflected that the

d if I can go back in to try and answer your Honor's questions on registration. He has not reapplied challenging the New York Appellate Division or the New York Supreme Court decision. There was a legal dispute. Mr. Epstein's counsel at the time believed that the classification in New York should be restricted to the o

hearsay directed toward filing charges against a defendant named Sarah Kellen. See A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida State Attorney expressly rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (which sought to charge

lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida Sta

) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00181035 EFTA00181036 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A

t submitted by police to the Florida prosecutor. See A.65 (Board Recommendation); A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). The allegations, even when aggregated, were not deemed by the Florida prosecutor who reviewed them to constitute sufficient "p

lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). The allegations, even when

ommentary (2006) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00232667 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A