Epstein Secrets

tz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

ershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

each, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2007, the foregoing document and the Declaration of Joseph Recarey will be served via hand delivery on Attorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel fo

. F2In Bonner v. City of Prichard , 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as precedent all decisions of the prior Fifth Circuit court of Appeals decided prior to October 1, 1981. FIThe Supreme Court called this "a novelty in criminal procedure with which we are wholly unacqu

tz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

ershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2007, the foregoing document and the Declaration of Joseph Recarey will be served via hand delivery on Attorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel fo

ury. UIn Bonner1 City of Prichard , 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as precedent all decisions of the prior Fifth Circuit court of Appeals decided prior to October 1, 1981. FIThe Supreme Court called this "a novelty in criminal procedure with which we are wholly unacqu

21 before you went and testified in the Grand Jury? 22 A. No. 23 Q. You don't remember that. 24 A. No. 25 Q. Do you remember Detective Recarey? Did you Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 500 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 97 01 316 EFTA00234320 Case 9:

t drive you? 18 A. I think my dad. Oh, my dad; my dad drove 19 me. 20 Q. Your dad drove you? 21 A. Yes, sir. 22 Q. So your testimony is Detective Recarey did 23 not drive you, correct? 24 MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. /asked and 25 answered. Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Palm Beach Lakes

ard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October I, 1981. 9 Lewis Tein n. 3059 GRAND AVINUI. Suits 340, Cocoma Won, CIORIOA 33133 9o33,6 EFTA00234232 Case 9:08-cv-80

21 before you went and testified in the Grand Jury? 22 A. No. 23 Q. You don't remember that. 24 A. No. 25 Q. Do you remember Detective Recarey? Did you Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 500 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 97 94 310 EFTA00180405 Case 9:

ember that. 24 A. No. 25 Q. Do you remember Detective Recarey? Did you Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1

ard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. 9 LeNyiA,Tyin 3059 GPM° AVTOPX. Swig 340, COCOINI 69091, halm 33133 9 91310 EFTA00180415 Case 9:08-cv-80804

8:47:53 Incident Report Page: 77 Program: CMS301L Case No • 1-05-000368 **************************** N A R R A T I V E # 37 NA Reported By: RECAREY, JOSEPH Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. On January 25, 2006, Det Caristo and in Lake Worth and met with year, when she was seventeen ears throu

F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the -----Laieventh-Cifeklit-Goen-of-Appeals-adepted-as-binding-preeedent-all dvcisiuns of tllc former Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. 9 LeSyjsjFein n. 3059 Gwe Sun 340. [Menu, GOOrt.ItOitrni. 33133 101319 EFTA00232141 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KA

e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). Fl In 1946, the Supreme Court define

om Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from PBPD. Neither document is ideal and his interviews of the girls and other investigative steps had some problems (although did an incredibly in

rassment. (It did, however, lead other girls to come forward and tell their stories.) Very early in the investigation, the FBI and I decided to put Recarey's police report and PC Affidavit to the side and to look at the case with fresh eyes. The facts discussed herein are based upon a personal review o