Epstein Secrets

same things that you had asked me to do earlier is improper meddling in civil litigation. Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00185240 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 3 OF 5 already been submitted to the Office on several occ

each Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one should have access

Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00185240 JAY P.

esh your memory that Villafon• le tried to get Apetelo to pay for Cheri. to represent you 19 In the federal case? 20 A. 21 O. Do toe know if Detective Recesiby has Moan 22 with your hither? 23 24 9. Do you know if Detective tecerey has spoken 25 to your ategmother7 Pklagra; "‘ — MVPS Ouch ., 500W

imony solely as a victim/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms. =, you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

same things that you had asked me to do earlier is improper meddling in civil litigation. Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00799653 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLED Docket 06/02/2017 Page 50 of 176 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ,

each Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one should have access

Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00799653 Case 9:

ee Ex. A. I had several oral and written communications with Mr. Eisenberg asking him if Jane Doe 2 would appear under the protection of a standard Kastigar letter, but he told me that Jane Doe 2 would only appear if statutory immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6001 was received. For example, in my letter

I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal

properly charge the case before presenting it for federal investigation and prosecution. In May 2006, I met with S/A Kuyrkendall and PBPD Detective Joe Recarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recare

ecarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal sexual conduct involving Epstein and his personal assistants. Briefly, Epstein, through his persona

in employees — Janusz Banasiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi