Epstein Secrets

m Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from PBPD. Neither document is ideal and his interviews of the girls and other investigative steps had some problems (although did an incredibly in-

dn't wait" for her to turn 18 so that he could take them on trips. 52 EFTA00234568 Very early in the investigation, the FBI and I decided to put Recarey's police report and PC Affidavit to the side and to look at the case with fresh eyes. The facts discussed herein are based upon a personal review o

ing, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age in the commission of a drug offense). In United States. Taylor, 239 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001), the Ninth Circuit addressed a defendant's assertion that knowledge of minority is required to convict him of transporting a minor for purposes of prostitution. The N

Maxwell was not the subject of this investigation that led to Mr. Epstein's being charged and pleading guilty. We just finished the deposition of Detective Recarey, who was the lead deposition -- the lead detective in the case, and he agreed that throughout this investigation he never spoke to Ms. Maxwell. No

deposition. Second, with respect to the representations regarding the deposition of Detective Recarey which occurred earlier this week, Detective Recarey did say that he sought to interview Ms. Maxwell in the course of that and did acknowledge that Ms. Maxwell is in the police reports. I just want to

le personal email plaintiff has ever sent or ever received in the course of however many years these accounts were open. In fact, Judge Kozinski in the Ninth Circuit allowed a civil suit against those who propounded these improper subpoenas, and that was with regard to a professional email account, as opposed t

, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age in the commission of a drug offense). In United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001), the Ninth Circuit addressed a defendant's assertion that knowledge of minority is required to convict him of transporting a minor for purposes of prostitution. The N

om Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from PBPD. Neither document is ideal and his interviews of the girls and other investigative steps had some problems (although did an incredibly in

rassment. (It did, however, lead other girls to come forward and tell their stories.) Very early in the investigation, the FBI and I decided to put Recarey's police report and PC Affidavit to the side and to look at the case with fresh eyes. The facts discussed herein are based upon a personal review o