Epstein Secrets

as contacted by- s9m~body vih9 was still in touch with Epstein. That person told her she would be compensated if she ·didn't cooperate with_ police, Rgcarey's report says. Those https//yM'Y'.,P.a.lm_b:~i3c:(1gailyn_~ws.c:oily<!rt]cJe/20Q60729/~EWS/.1 fl091757~ CA/ Aronberg-000162 FILED: PALM BEACH COUN

research. 1 I By th~n, r~fo.ti'ons betwe~JJ. police and. pro~ecutors were fraying; At a key meeting: with prosecutors and· the defense, Detective Joseph R.ecarey, the le_ad iny~stigatqr, w::1.s a,no·-~how, according to Epstein's attorney. "The elllbar.rassnient on the prosecutor's face was evident when the p

man said she was told. Fh 1one records 1·· . •. show the woman talked with the person who allegedly:intimiaat~g her:around the tin;te she :said, .Recarey reported. Phone records. also s_how that. the person said to have made the threat: then place·d a eali to Epstein's personal assistant, who iil tur

access to criminal proceedings, see, e.g., Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the judicial process, which public scrutiny is supposed to safeguard, is just a

s evidence retrie\red following a search ofEpsteinls home, ~hawed that many ofthe girls involved were under the a'ge of 18. According to D_etective Recarey, the lead detective on the_ case, one of the photos re~ove:d frotn the master I I i I Greenberg Traurig, PA ■ 40_1 East Las Olas Bouleva_rd, Sui

s involved were under the age of 18. According to Detective Recarey, the lead detective on the case, one of the photo

Q3Q117 CA/Ar"l)/L'E\l59PJ.1"\& BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. *27/2023 4:10:49 PM 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th j Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the judicial process, which public scrutiny is supposed to safeguard, is just

during their research. By theni relations between police and prosecutors were fraying. At a key meeting with prosecutors and the defensei Detective Joseph Recarey, the lead investigator, was a no-showi according to Epstein's attorney. "The embarrassment on the prosecutor's face was evident when the police off

sment on the prosecutor's face was evident when the police officer never showed up for the meeting/' attorney Jack Goldberger said. Later in Aprili Recarey walked into a prosecutor's office at the state attorney's office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn. The prosecutori Lanna Belohlav

cess to criminal proceedings, see, e.g., Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 15 ACTIVE 696232185v3 judicial process, which p

rt Inherent Power to Release; Proper Victim's Petition; CVRA-authorized release; Material Severable Box #3 P412130 Thru P412150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of Un

#3 P412130 Thru P412150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings;

ds, a type of restitution; "[c]riminal forfeiture is . . . separate from restitution, which serves an entirely different purpose." United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir. 2011). Among other differences between restitution and forfeiture, only the criminal defendant is subject to restit