Epstein Secrets

pstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY.64,Nu. F(31 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2007). At the time she tiled Detective Recarey's affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material misrepresentations, including gross misstatements of witness statements and other evidence. Secon

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

d serious misrepresentations before a court. On July 31, 2007, in the grand-jury litigation arising out of this case, she filed the "Declaration of Joseph Recarey," attaching the state detective's affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 an

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

eason to believe that, around this same time, Mr. former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.5 At the same time (and until as recent] as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar websitc continued to identify Mr. as a named partner

for Mr. Epstein. Currently, the structure of our representation is that I will be the one in communication with you, Lanna Belohlavek and Detective Recarey regarding the investigation and prosecution of this matter. Mr. Dershowitz remains involved however, at this point, I do not anticipate him contact

t you may have with the store to mention Mr. Epstein's name or the investigation (especially in light of reports from multiple witnesses indicating Detective Recarey is providing damaging mis-information). Please let me know if you have any questions about the report and I will do whatever I can to immediately r

7/26/17 Page 47 of 131 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 Alan Dershowitz 1525 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 617-939-6001 Joseph Recarey Detective Palm Beach Police Department 345 S. County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Re: Epstein matter Dear Detective Recarey: I am sending you thi

ug dealer at 5:45 a.m., only two days after returning to West Palm Beach, and being described by the officer as clearly on drugs; and (iii) both of Saige's parents' criminal history of fraud. In stark contrast to this is the fact that, as we indicated at the meeting, the client has passed both a rigo

m Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from PBPD. Neither document is ideal and his interviews of the girls and other investigative steps had some problems (although did an incredibly in-

dn't wait" for her to turn 18 so that he could take them on trips. 52 EFTA00234568 Very early in the investigation, the FBI and I decided to put Recarey's police report and PC Affidavit to the side and to look at the case with fresh eyes. The facts discussed herein are based upon a personal review o

r object; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose." Fl. Stat. § 800.04(1)(a). The only girl under 16, Saige, was digitally penetrated, which satisfies this definition. "The Florida Legislature currently is amending § 800.04(7) making it a second-degree fe

that one's been deleted. So | don't know which one you're referring to. A. No. Q. You don't remember that. A. No. Q. Do you remember Detective Recarey? Did you ever meet a Detective Recarey? 72 As, | don't know the names. Q. How many different detectives have you met with on this case from Palm

A. No. Q. Stepmom didn't drive you? A. | think my dad. Oh, my dad / my dad drove me. Q. Your dad drove you? A. Yes, sir. Q. So your testimony is Detective Recarey did not drive you, correct? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection /asked and answered. THE WITNESS: No. I'm pretty sure my dad 73 drove me because he was there

TXT answer the question, because any of those conversations involve her counsel. MR. TEIN: Certify that. MR. LEOPOLD: Please. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Now, Saige, you lied to get out of this deposition, didn't you? 54 A. No, sir. Q. You didn't want to come to court today and tell the story that you had tol

d Jury’s indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department’s raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcriptio

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements

g out of this case, she filed the “Declaration of Joseph Recarey,” attaching the state detective’s affidavit in su

o believe that, around this same time, Mr. Sloman’s former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.> At the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar website continued to identify Mr. Sloman as a named pa

(808) 832-2904 From: Cabato, Nilda Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:14 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Sarah L. Kellen Detective Joe Recarey, Below is the subject's photo image. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns. Nilda I. Cabato Supervising Driver License Clerk 808-8

ice.com' Subject: Sarah L. Kellen Detective Joe Recarey, Below is the subject's photo image. Please call

that's fine. And then she got off the phone and then Zack said, I was like too, why are you describing me, who are you talking to. And she was like Saige, do you want to go with me tomorrow, I'm gonna go pick up some money from my boss's house. And then she's like, cause I get paid tomorrow and then