Epstein Secrets

do that transaction on II against Brad Edward➢ accusing him of having been a II behalf of Jeffrey Epstein•a victims? 12 knowing participant in Scott Rothstein'➢ Rani 12 MR. LINK: Object to the form. 13 scheme -- 13 NITHESS: Nell, it was the right 14 MR. LINK: Object to the form. 14 thing to do.

e had reached the point where in 2008 you faced the economic reality of having to leave the bench. where did you than go? A I was hired by the Rothstein, Rosonfoldt a Adler firm. O How did that cone about? A As I said, I was interviewing with two firms. 10 There wore two largo firma that had

nd I think I met Spencer Kuvin. I just 7 believe the witness has finished his 7 can't place exactly where it wan. It wasn't at the 8 response. S Rothstein office. And I just don't -- it was somewhere 1 THE WITNESS: And wo keep talking about t in Went Palm Beach -- at a law firm in West Palm. 10 mo

n't have any further 15 A Yes. 25 questions. 16 Q Right. And I bet it was a shock to you 16 REDIRECT EXAMINATION 13 that ho was running a Ponzl scram, because nowhere 17 BY KR. SCAROLA: IS in your mind would you have thought that was 10 0 Ara there any other sections of this 19 possib

A is currently a debtor in bankruptcy. RRA is not named as a Defendant). FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America I Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C.

icle or other commodity. THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSPIRATORS 7. The roles of the conspirators were as follows: A. Defendant scorr W. ROTHSTEIN was a shareholder, Chairman and CEO of RRA. Through his position at RRA, defendant ROTHSTEIN promoted, managed, and supervised the administration o

hn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott.W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the ent

", but were being contacted, subpoenaed or listed to harass and Intimidate them and Epstein, and to add "star" appeal to the marketing effort of the Ponzl scheme. EFTA00193829 Epstelni. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS,

t bear in 3 you, Judge Ray. 4 mind that this is one objector, there's a lot 4 THE COURT: You can't proceed against 5 more documents than that 5 Rothstein in the State Court, they're here. 6 To the best of our knowledge, the 6 MR. KNIGHT: And that Is the same thing I 7 documents that pertain to the

Brad Edwards and LM personally, and Scott 6 Now, the only reason the trustee is 6 Rothstein, and ifs ratan estate claim, it's 7 here — 7 against Scott Rothstein personally. 8 THE COURT: Walt, there's been a privilege 8 So my suggestion, your Honor, is that 9 asserted in the State Court proceeding? 9 you

z, where I think that we had told her 21 originally we had heard there were, as an 22 example, sonic loan files or transaction files 23 related to Ponzl deals related to Mr. Epstein, 24 because I remember myself even hearing that going 25 back many, many, many months ago. Pitt 31 1 they had been

1CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the ent

cordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and prof

good faith and with the bests interests of their clients In mind at all times when in reality, they were acting in furtherance of the investment or Ponzl scheme described herein. EPSTEIN justifiably relied to his detriment on the representations of RRA, and Defendants, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and as to h