Epstein Secrets

ential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty ROTHSTEIN was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake investments." Attorney Sakowitz was also quoted as saying ROTHSTEIN had sophisticated eavesd

ey claim a lack of knowledge when: a. The firm had 24 hour security in the form of Broward County Sheriff's officers on each floor of the offices; b. ROTHSTEIN had 24 hour (firm paid) security at his home; c. Partners/attorneys/staff could not directly access ROTHSTEIN without going through extensive secur

Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, STUART ROSENFELDT, individually, WILLIAM BERGER, individually, RUSSELL ADLER, individually, DEBBIE VILLEGAS, individually, DAVID BODEN, individually, ANDREW BARNETT, individually, KENNETH JENNE, individually, MICHAEL FIST

ential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty ROTHSTEIN was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake investments." Attorney Sakowitz was also quoted as saying ROTHSTEIN had sophisticated eavesd

problems with the firm existed when: a. RRA had 24 hour security in the form of Broward County Sheriffs officers on each floor of the law offices; b. ROTHSTEIN had 24 hour (firm paid) security at his home; c. Partners/attorneys/staff could not directly access ROTHSTEIN without going through extensive secur

EY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, STUART ROSENFELDT, individually, RUSSELL ADLER, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, WILLIAM BERGER, individually, KENNETH JENNE, individually, MICHAEL FISTEN, individually, and L.

his case come from the following sources: (1) the Defendants' Answer [D.E. 67] to the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint; (2) the criminal proceedings of Scott W. Rothstein and Debra Villegas;' (3) the affidavits and exhibits of attached to the Motion and Reply; and (4) the affidavit and exhibits attached to the Respon

urt takes judicial notice of the criminal Information [D.E. 1], the Plea Agreement [D.E. 69], and the Judgment [D.E. 290] filed in United States v. Rothstein, 09-60331-JIC (S.D. Fla. 2009), as well as the information [D.E. 1], and plea agreement [D.E. 20-2r filed in United States v. Vilieges, 10.60126-WJZ

TRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION In re: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. HERBERT STETTIN, Chapter 11 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL ADLER and KATIE ADLER, Defendants. CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR CHAPTER 11 Adv. Pro. No 10.02612-BKC-RBR-A ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL