Epstein Secrets

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN

be 18 relevant to the malicious prosecution claim 19 and the alleged ginning up of those claims, 20 the alleged attempt to align himself with 21 Rothstein, the alleged attempt to factor 22 these cases, potentially Mr. Edwards' 23 conduct as it related to those factoring 24 matters. (12/5/17 Tr. 79:2

9/17 Tr. 110:13-19.) Edwards has identified M. on his Witness List. [D.E. 1042, ¶ 15.] Edwards has also designated and cross designated portions of M.'s testimony to be used at the trial of this matter. [D.E. 1022; D.E. 1130.] Because M. is incarcerated, the parties can only rely on her deposition t

1CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the ent

cordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and prof

g a book of "Psalms" that she obtained from a religious store (DT 152:1-14). Under the circumstances, her claim for damages against EPSTEIN, one of M.'s many "Johns" during that same period, would be so incredible and certainly not likely to produce the extraordinary settlements promised to "RRA's i

t udge ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR.. ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive. Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS. ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss. P

REY EPSTEIN, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SPECIAL SET HEARING THIS CAUSE having come before this Court upon Plaintiff, M.'s, Motion for Special Set Hearing, and the Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, it is hereby: ORDERED AND ADJUD

Plaintiff. Jane Doe 3 BRAD 1. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Dietary Case, Sete 1650 40

ed out °M.'s the 21 first time. 22 Q. All right So sometime in the latter part of 23 2006ar moved back ton's - I'm sorry -- you moved 24 from M.'s apartment in West Palm Beach, so the latter 25 part of 2006 to sometime In 2007, you were living back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1