Epstein Secrets

Razorback Funding, LLC, et at, v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at Complex Litigation Division - Case No.: 09-062943 (19) Third Amended Complaint By ignoring evidence of the Principal Conspirators' miscondu

Plaintiffs have discovered, relative to Levin, Preve, and Banyon, that: a. an $8,000,000.00 wire transfer confirmation used by Levin, Preve, and Rothstein to induce Razorback's $32,000,000.00 payment was never received by RRA or TD Bank. In fact, the fictitious $8,000,000.00 wire is powerful evidence

and has not been returned. Specific examples of Gibraltar Bank's overt acts, assistance and/or omissions in furtherance of the conspiracy include: a. Rothstein learned early in his scheme that he could not convince wealthy investors to give him money unless he established relationships with financial insti

of fiduciary duty have resulted in these Plaintiffs significant losses. F. Szafranski, ABS and Onyx 313. Plaintiffs have discovered relative to Szafranski, ABS and Onyx that: a. the TD Bank account statements provided and verified by Szafranski were completely fabricated and incapable of being confir

Investments 19.1 D3 Capital CLub concerned Epstein alleged settlements? 19.2 Were you aware? 19.3 Did other lawyers in the firm (partners) know Scott Rothstein ran investments? 19.4 Did lawyers at the firm know of the structured settlement business? 19.5 How could they not know? 19.6 Did Edwards know?

E NO.: 80743 DRAFT 4 18 11 8:21 PM Epstein v. Rothstein & Edwards Outline for Russell Adler Deposition,

age 10 DRAFT 4 18 11 8:21 PM 19.13 Did Villegas know about JEE deals? 19.14 Know Michael Szafranski (or of him)? 19.14.1 If yes, explain role of Szafranski regarding JEE cases? 19.14.2 He was an independent verifier, did he know him to do that? 19.14.3 what is that? 19.15 Do you know about Epstein fli

UIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-062943 07 RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, Defendants. DAY 8 - AFTERNOON SESSION DEPOSITION OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN DATE TAKEN: TIME: PLACE: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:00 p.m

k was taken.) 11 (Whereupon, The Funds' Exhibit No. 261 was 12 marked for identification.) 13 BY MR. LAUER: 14 Q Okay. I am handing you, Mr. Rothstein, 15 Exhibit 261, which is a photostatic copy of Confidential 16 Settlement Agreement and Release. It bears production 17 PRODA 21183 through 21

) 525- 2221 EFTA00314952 Page 2254 1 the Razorback deal or the earlier deals for verification 2 that the settlements were real? 3 A Me, Mr. Szafranski, and Mr. Preve. 4 Q And who were they relying on for verification 5 that the defendants were actually wiring the settlement 6 money into the e

UIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-062943 07 RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, Defendants. DAY 8 - AFTERNOON SESSION DEPOSITION OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN DATE TAKEN: TIME: PLACE: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:00 p.m

k was taken.) 11 (Whereupon, The Funds' Exhibit No. 261 was 12 marked for identification.) 13 BY MR. LAUER: 14 Q Okay. I am handing you, Mr. Rothstein, 15 Exhibit 261, which is a photostatic copy of Confidential 16 Settlement Agreement and Release. It bears production 17 PRODA 21183 through 21

R1_00015711 EFTA01735051 Page 2254 1 the Razorback deal or the earlier deals for verification 2 that the settlements were real? 3 A Me, Mr. Szafranski, and Mr. Preve. 4 Q And who were they relying on for verification 5 that the defendants were actually wiring the settlement 6 money into the e

, STEVEN ZARETSKY as Trustee of the JANE ZARETSKY DYNASTY TRUST, LAWRENCE E. DEKELBAUM, AND SHALOM STRICTLY KOSHER MEATS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, DAVID BODEN, DEBRA VILLEGAS, ANDREW BARNETT, IRENE STAY, TD BANK, N.A., FRANK A. SPINOSA, JENNIFER ICERSTETTER, ROSANNE CARETSKY, BANYON INCOM

sing from the same set of operative facts as the Jane Doe case, but involving a different underage female plaintiff To bolster his concocted story, Rothstein invited D3 representatives to his office to view the thirteen banker's boxes of actual case files in Jane Doe in order to demonstrate that the claim

ttempted to take the depositions of these celebrities in a deliberate effort to bolster Rothstein's fictitious story. 92. Conspicuously, Preve and Szafranski shared an office inside RRA one floor down from Rothstein's office, which provided them direct access to assist Rothstein in the furtherance of the