hat ingredients were in the powder. Winston admitted to FBI in- vestigators shortly after the enve- lopes were received that she was the sender. But Villegas has filed a motion to suppress all of her state- ments to law enforcement, saying she was not properly advised of her right to avoid self-incriminati

12 Who at the firm helped Scott create or operate the Epstein investments? EFTA00600188 April 18, 2011 Page 10 DRAFT 4 18 11 8:21 PM 19.13 Did Villegas know about JEE deals? 19.14 Know Michael Szafranski (or of him)? 19.14.1 If yes, explain role of Szafranski regarding JEE cases? 19.14.2 He was an

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Ft. Lauderdale) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:10-cr-60126-WJZ All Defendants Case title: USA v. Villegas Assigned to: Judge William I Zloch Defendant (1) Debra Villegas 91426-004 YOB 1967 TERMINATED: 10/12/2010 Pending Counts MONEY LAUNDERING-TRA

tims' 165:14 video 55:6 166:16 videographer 2:21 4:1.12 55:2,5 131:2,5 146:9,12 169:5 videotaped 1:13 3:3 4:4 6:12 view 105:1 145:11 158:10 Villegas 138:13 violation 165:3 violently 92:21 visually 70:5 voice 84:6 voluntarily 106:13 106:19 168:20 volunteering 51:14 voting 14:20,25 vs 1:7

't remember who asked 24 me that, one of those gentlemen. 25 We talked about transparency. And this was - to Many of them asked questions of Ms. Villegas because she was represented to have been with me for over two decades and my COO and worked her way up from secretary, and they inquired about my

gas, RRA's Chief Operating Officer, plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. [D.E. 119 at "83-93]. In her plea agreement, Villegas acknowledged that "a co-conspirator (Rothstein] distributed lavish gifts, including exotic cars, jewelry, boats, loans, cash and bonuses, to indivi

ow long my employees had been with 10 me and whether I trusted them, specifically my CFO, Irene 11 Stay. 12 Many of them asked questions of Ms. Villegas 13 because she was represented to have been with me for over 14 two decades and my COO and worked her way up from 15 secretary, and they inquir

s were part of a Ponzi scheme." Also named as a co-defendant is former RRA COO Debra Villegas, "Rothstein's number two at RRA." Scherer writes that Villegas "furnished false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors." Then there is Andrew Barnett, RRA's director of corporate development. S

s were part of a Ponzi scheme." Also named as a co-defendant is former RRA COO Debra Villegas, "Rothstein's number two at RRA." Scherer writes that Villegas "furnished false bank account statements and wire transfers to investors." Then there is Andrew Barnett, RRA's director of corporate development. S

1838255 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) passim United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007) 169 United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324 (2d Cir. 1990) 115 EFTA00103022 United States v. Walker, 191 F.3d 326 (2d Cir. 1999) 70 United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d. 37

of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of

1838255 (W.D.N.Y. May 8,2014) passim United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4,2007) 169 United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324 (2d Cir. 1990) 115 EFTA00099964 United States v. Walker, 191 F.3d 326 (2d Cir. 1999) 70 United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d. 37

of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of

1838255 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) passim United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007) 169 United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324 (2d Cir. 1990) 115 EFTA00077629 United States v. Walker, 191 F.3d 326 (2d Cir. 1999) 70 United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d. 37

of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of

1838255 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) passim United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007) 169 United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324 (2d Cir. 1990) 115 EFTA00039444 United States v. Walker, 191 F.3d 326 (2d Cir. 1999) 70 United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d. 37

of privacy rather than that of a third party." United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727, 731 (1980) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1333 (2d Cir. 1990). Ultimately, the Fourth Amendment inquiry is "whether [a] defendant has established a legitimate expectation of

W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) 37, 38, 39, 154 United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007) 114 United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324 (2d Cir. 1990) 82 United States v. Walker, 191 F.3d 326 (2d Cir. 1999) 48 United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d. 37 (2d Cir. 1999)

dulent conduct alleged herein while willfully ignoring and/or failing to exercise reasonable care. 52. Defendant, DEBRA E. VILLEGAS (hereinafter, "Villegas"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was the chief operating officer at RRA. Villegas, Rothst

r."; xiv. Preve received over $440,000.00 in payments from the Principal Conspirators; C. Villegas 310. Plaintiffs have discovered relative to Villegas that: a. on July 27, 2009, Rothstein transferred a property with an assessed value of $407,750.00 to Villegas for "love and affection" and $100.00