Epstein Secrets

m undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegations to help his former law partner, imprisoned and disbarred Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein, perpetuate a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme. CA/Aronberg-000198 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM NOT A CERTIFIED

O, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM The revelations’of the settlements came as part of an ongoing lawsuit that started as a dispute between Epstein and Rothstein, both billionaires. i A year after Epstein in 2008 pleaded guilty to solicitation ofprostitution- and procuring a minor for prostitution, he sued Rot

t alleges that "dozens" of underage girls were brought into Epstein's mansions for sexual encounters. A few days later, owing to public outcry over the NP A with Epstein entered into by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, who by then was serving as U.S. Secretary of

ned herein including, but not limited to, the discovery abuses and bad faith litigation tactics that Epstein has been the subject of at the hands of Scott Rothstein and his-co-conspirators, any tax returns must be redacted to preserve confidently and to prevent further abuses. See supra. Further, Epstein's com

us civil litigation abuses that resulted in profoundly serious injury to Jeffrey Epstein, including substantial attorneys' fees and costs. In short, Rothstein and his co-conspirators forged Federal court orders and opinions and, among other things, staged a series of depositions that were unrelated to any

not consider the privacy rights of other alleged victims. As this Court knows, attached to the NP A is a list which delineates alleged victims. Once the NP A was made public, Judge Colbath, with the agreement of the Palm Beach Post, Brad Edwards, Esq. and Spencer Kuvin, Esq. agreed that the "list" would

ounsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Su

Docket 06/10/2009 Page 5 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 5 inclined to grant this Order, then in order to continue to protect the confidentiality of the NP A and to comply with the Court's prior Orders, Exhibit A and Exhibit B, Defendant would agree to allow Plaintiff to file under seal her response and