Epstein Secrets

his case come from the following sources: (1) the Defendants' Answer [D.E. 67] to the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint; (2) the criminal proceedings of Scott W. Rothstein and Debra Villegas;' (3) the affidavits and exhibits of attached to the Motion and Reply; and (4) the affidavit and exhibits attached to the Respon

urt takes judicial notice of the criminal Information [D.E. 1], the Plea Agreement [D.E. 69], and the Judgment [D.E. 290] filed in United States v. Rothstein, 09-60331-JIC (S.D. Fla. 2009), as well as the information [D.E. 1], and plea agreement [D.E. 20-2r filed in United States v. Vilieges, 10.60126-WJZ

tor. Fransen v. Nicassio Corp. (In re Metro Sewer Servs., Inc.), 374 B.R. 316, 324 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007) (citing Kapila v. WLN Ltd. P'ship (In re Leneve), 341 B.R. 53, 56 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2006)). After questioning by the Court at the hearing, Counsel for the Defendants agreed that there is no dispu

Esq. Brad Edwards, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 4

ccurred within certain statutory time periods; and (4) the debtor made the transfer with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. See In re Leneve, 341 B.R. 53, 56 (S.D. Fla. 2006). Courts typically resort to the "badges of fraud," to determine fraudulent intent. Id. at 61. The Eleventh Circui

Esq. Brad Edwards, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. C

ccurred within certain statutory time periods; and (4) the debtor made the transfer with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors. See In re Leneve, 341 B.R. 53, 56 (S.D. Fla. 2006). Courts typically resort to the "badges of fraud," to determine fraudulent intent. Id. at 61. The Eleventh Circui