Epstein Secrets

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

cenber with what this case is, because I 23 those natters have been fully briefed. 23 keep ➢aying co the Court chat Mr. Edwards wants to 24 Mr. Burlington is here to present argument In 24 try a detonation action, he wants to clear his 2$ response to the notion regarding Dr. Jansen. is name, he wa

seated at counsel table for many years, as I have 12 another disk that they rode and kept. If the Court 13 known Mr. Scarola and Mi➢a Terry, Kr. Burlington, 12 will instruct as part of this order that we II and I think they recognize that when this Court 14 maintain the boxes, because Fowler mite w

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

cenber with what this case is, because I 23 those natters have been fully briefed. 23 keep ➢aying co the Court chat Mr. Edwards wants to 24 Mr. Burlington is here to present argument In 24 try a detonation action, he wants to clear his 2$ response to the notion regarding Dr. Jansen. is name, he wa

seated at counsel table for many years, as I have 12 another disk that they made and kept. If the Court 12 known Mr. Scarola and Hiss Terry, Kr. Burlington, 13 will instruct as part of this order that we 14 and I think they recognize that when this Court 14 maintain the boxes, because Fouler mite w

T COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS VOLUME I DATE TAKEN: Tuesday, October 3r

4 25 of the primary element of the malicious prosecution claim, what may have been in the mindset of Mr. Epstein when he filed the claim against Rothstein, Edwards and LM -- initials being used only since she was allegedly a minor at the time that the suit was brought -- is of importance to the Court

his deposition testimony, his response to certain discovery requests, the undisputed facts available at the time he filed suit, the indictment of Scott Rothstein, every report in which it's discussed what Mr. Edwards and RRA were doing in these Epstein cases, as well as the filings in the federal court, and

Honor, the first issue raised with regard to that motion is the argument that that motion is precluded by virtue of collateral estoppel. And Mr. Burlington res judicata -- excuse me Mr. Burlington is here to address that. If it's easier for the Court, I have an extra copy of the motion that I can han

r third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any plaintiffs case. 7. All investment packages, or information, settlement agreeme

orated Memorandum of Law Page 4 of9 7. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a recent article as saying that he had met with Rothstein as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in de

s served by fax and U.S. Mail to Kendall Coffey, Esq., counsel for Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, individually, and Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Coffey Burlington, 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, Florida 33133, and Paul Singerman, Esq., counsel for Herbert Stettin, Esq. as Court Appointed Receiver

KR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I respected coach and former coach of the Heat -- a have one ninute to confer with appellate counsel to Scott Rothstein wan sitting on thin stuff. That's 7 ado sure there's nothing I need to do to preserve i not what happened hero. That's the point that I'm • this

an agreement. And 19 THE COUR?: I nay have font you. ?he 74,000 in our agreement, your court order says no 20 pages wore self-generated from the Rothstein firm: additional exhibits unless the parties agree. In 21 MR. LINK: Yes. And delivered by the trustee the pretrial stip Kr. scarola and I agree

• seated at counsel table for many years, as I have 12 another disk that they coda and kept. If the C, .1 known Mr. Scarola and Miss Worry, Mr. Burlington, and I think they recognize that when this Court 13 14 will instruct as part of this order that we maintain the boxes, because Fouler mite Minte

09. The Court having reviewed the file including Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s November 16, 2009 Respo

s to Mr. Stettin. A ~"'r~k. DONE and ORDERED this~ day of ~l:H1,1ary; 2010. Courtesy copies: All Counsel of Record Kendall Coffey, Esq. Coffey Burlington Office in the Grove, Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33133 James C. Cunningham, Jr. Berger Singerman, 2000 South Biscayne Blvd.